Teacher Workload: Requires Improvement

It’s been a while… I started this blog as a bit of summer holiday fun, but it was quickly torpedoed (like the rest of my social life) by the unmanageable workload of being a primary school teacher. As a teacher in a small inner-city school in London, I’ve seen firsthand the toll that excessive workload can take on teachers’ mental health and overall well-being. It’s no secret that teachers are overworked and underappreciated, but what often gets overlooked are some of the root causes of the issue. In this post, I want to delve deeper into why teacher workload has become unmanageable and offer some possible solutions to help alleviate the burden.

I was inspired by this recent BBC article to write this post. The title was ‘Teachers working 12-hour days, leaked report says’. This left me wondering why my daily reality was newsworthy? It makes me ticked off that despite the overwhelming workload and pressure that teachers face daily, most people still don’t seem to understand the demands of the job. It’s frustrating that it takes a leaked report or a news article to bring attention to the issue, when it should be common knowledge that teaching is an incredibly demanding profession that requires much more than just standing in front of a classroom for a few hours each day. I’ve summarised the article here:

  • A leaked government report found that almost a quarter of teachers in England are working 12-hour days.
  • 22% of teachers reported working 60 hours a week or more.
  • The report found that high workload was a key factor in why one in four teachers are considering leaving the state sector in the next year.
  • Three-quarters of teachers said they spent too much time on paperwork, while almost three-quarters said their workload was “unacceptable.”
  • The Education Secretary has announced a new taskforce to help reduce teachers’ workload by an average of five hours a week.

While the report is shedding light on the issue, I feel there is little real discussion about what is causing the issue. What is all of this ‘paperwork’? Here are the four issues that immediately come to mind for me, in my particular context:

  1. Constant reinvention of the wheel in terms of curriculum and planning

Many schools are obsessed with constant reinvention of the curriculum and planning, even when there are well-researched and accepted schemes that could save teachers a lot of time and energy. This can create a huge workload for teachers, who often end up spending countless hours creating resources for the same subjects. I know of schools where senior leaders check or even wipe their planning systems to make sure no one uses the last year’s planning, even within the same year group and topic. This constant push for creativity and tailoring the curriculum creates huge workload for teachers, with thousands of teachers creating resources for the same subjects. A few people paid to do it really well (then shared nationally for free), that teachers could then minimally adapt for their setting would be so much better.

  1. Unecessary resource creation, especially at primary

Primary teachers often have to plan for a wide range of topics and subjects, which can create a staggering amount of workload. There are not always a large number of resources available, and teachers often end up creating worksheets and other materials from scratch. While many primary teachers shudder in horror at the idea of textbooks, but in reality, we’re spending so much time planning, creating worksheets for that planning, sticking those sheets in books. Especially in subjects like maths and science – a quality textbook (or choice of) would provide a useful framework for planning and for cutting down on constantly creating resources. Bring back the books!

  1. Expectations from senior leaders and Ofsted for subject leaders

It is unfair to judge small primary school teachers who are subject leaders for 2 or more subjects on the same criteria as large primary schools. Senior leaders and Ofsted often have unrealistic expectations for subject leaders, particularly in small primary schools where all teachers are often subject leaders for multiple subjects. Assessment criteria for subject leadership is broadly similar to that of large secondary schools, where subject leaders might have deputies, and time out of class.

  1. Unreasonable and outdated expectations from senior leaders

Senior leaders can perpetuate outdated practices that make workload unmanageable, such as onerous marking requirements and the need for daily, weekly, monthly, medium-term, and long-term lesson plans. Teachers should be trusted to plan and feedback to pupils in a way that is useful and sustainable for everyone.

To address these issues, we need to advocate for our own well-being and effective practices. Many of the problems with workload lie within our own school building, and we need to have tough conversations with our senior leaders to effect change. We also need greater understanding and sympathy from parents, governors, and the government, who may not fully appreciate the day-to-day tasks of teachers.

In conclusion, it is time for us to take a stand and address the issue of unmanageable workload in education. We must work together to create effective solutions that will benefit both teachers and students alike.

When it comes to teacher workload, it’s time for schools to go from Requires Improvement to Outstanding, before we all end up feeling Inadequate.

Ticked Off Teacher

Signed,

3 things teachers want more than Rishi Sunak’s promises for artificial intelligence

More education news in the Tory Leadership Race as Sunak announces support for teachers by encouraging the adoption of AI in classrooms

The Tory leadership race seemingly has a new battleground, education, and school policy. Truss and Sunak have both been making a series of promises to reform education. Sunak’s latest soundbite has been the promise to introduce AI into classrooms to reduce teacher workloads and ‘inspire’ pupils.

This Ticked Off Teacher is pleased to see teacher workload and wellbeing being discussed as part of education reform. However, the promises are unclear and there are definite limitations to the application of AI in education. When the profession is crying out for support, in the midst of a recruitment and retention crisis, it seems like a bizarre solution to the problem of teacher wellbeing and workload.

The Ticked Off Teacher has prepared a letter to Mr. Sunak to voice their concerns.


Dear Mr. Sunak,

Firstly, thank you for bringing to light that there are issues surrounding teacher workload. While it’s an interesting proposal, I thought you might be interested in some other well-researched measures which are sure to increase teacher well-being exponentially more, and cut the costs for the Conservatives.

1) Coffee for staff – £300 per teacher

It’s official! Teachers in England work the longest hours in the world, over 25% of teachers work more than 60 hours per week. My proposal is to offer some kind of season-ticket loan scheme for an annual Pret subscription. Subsidising caffeinating the workforce could only boost wellbeing and productivity.

2) Biscuits for the Staff Room – £376,000

With 32,163 schools in the UK and an average of 39 teaching weeks per year, it would only cost Sunak’s government approximately £376,000 to provide each staff room with a pack of ASDA own brand custard creams each week for the entire academic year. Yes, workloads may be increasing, but it’s pretty hard to be sad with a custard cream in your mouth.

3) Name-Brand Glue Sticks – £7.5 million

Any teacher will tell you that name-brand Pritt Sticks are like gold dust. Amazon has a pack of 5 for £12 at the moment, so I did you the liberty of doing the maths to give each teacher in the UK a pack. Surely we could all chip in for a Costco card or something to bring the cost down further?

I hope you found my suggestions to be insightful. In the unlikely event that they don’t do the trick, I suggest you consider – increasing PPA, funding intervention teachers, investing in SEN provision, and creating a free centralised platform of classroom resources.

Signed,

Think custard creams will cut it or our ideas are crumbs? Comment below.

Raising school start age in Scotland to six – what does the evidence say?

A bold move for Scotland’s devolved Education is seeing a proposal for a kindergarten stage for three to six-year-olds being debated at the SNP’s conference in October, but what evidence is there?

Education has been a central issue of British politics in the last few weeks, with PM hopeful Liz Truss pitching herself as the ‘education prime minister’. However, it’s the push in Scotland for a shake-up in the early years that has got Twitter talking.

What’s the current system?

Scotland has had a fully devolved system of education since 1999. Scottish children take different exams at the end of secondary school, and do not pay tuition fees at Scottish universities. The rest of the system functions largely similarly to the rest of the UK.

What’s the problem?

Audit Scotland found that there is a ‘wide’ gap between the richest and poorest students in Scotland (1). The report also found that the effect of Covid-19 has negatively impacted work to close the attainment gap. The report reads that the ‘attainment gap has remained a feature of our society for generations and does not do justice to the type of Scotland we wish to build’.

What’s the solution?

Toni Giugliano, the SNP’s policy convenor, has called for a ‘culture shift’ in how Scotland administers early years education, with the hope of improving children’s mental health and closing the poverty attainment gap (2). He said that the current system was ‘designed to build a workforce’ and did not reflect education for a digital age. The proposal is for a play-based kindergarten for three to six-year-olds, followed by six years of primary school.

What isn’t happening

There has been a significant amount of misinformation, misunderstanding and comparison to ‘Scandinavian’ education systems, where it is more common for children to start formal education at seven. However, in Scotland the proposal is not to delay starting school until 7, but to actually add an additional year of funded kindergarten starting a year earlier than in the current system, starting with a kindergarten at age 3.

What evidence is there to raising the school starting age?

Raising the school starting age is increasingly common in developed nations (3). However, research literature has not shown clear educational or economic advantages. A 2018 paper (4) measured a proximate outcome of academic achievement, measures of mental health in childhood. It found that a one-year delay in the start of school dramatically reduces inattention and hyperactivity at age 7, and persists at age 11, a strong indicator of student achievement. However, this widely cited paper has various issues of generalisability. The variation between systems of education, pupil and teacher demographics, teacher training etc. makes it very hard to predict what the outcome would be in Scotland were the proposal to move forward.

What’s next?

The general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS), Larry Flanagan, said that he was not opposed to a kindergarten stage and believed in a play-based approach to the early years. However, he was also clear that the change would require a considerable amount of resources and training that are not currently in place.

A Scottish government spokeswoman confirmed that the government does not have plans to change the school age (2) but that it welcomes the debate as part of the national discussion on education and will inform future reforms to improve outcomes.

Scotland’s neighbours and the rest of the world will surely have their eyes on Aberdeen as the issue is debated at the SNP conference in October.

Signed,

Sources

  1. https://www.gov.scot/publications/closing-poverty-related-attainment-gap-report-progress-2016-2021/
  2. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-62368574
  3. https://expatchild.com/school-starting-ages-around-world/
  4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hec.3638

Step forwards or backwards? What do you think of the kindergarten proposal? Comment your ideas below.